Saturday, June 27, 2009

More seniors turning to reverse mortgages


When Judy Kralik and her husband, Andrew, downsized and moved to Valparaiso in 2005, she thought life would be easier.

But when her husband of 47 years died from esophageal cancer less than a year later, things got tough: her income did not comfortably cover her mortgage and other living expenses.

"Our income just really went down, and I was on Social Security," Kralik said.

Kralik, 69, turned to a reverse mortgage to get the extra money she needed. She now receives a check each month for about $435 that will continue for the rest of her life.

Like Kralik, more seniors are using reverse mortgages to tap into their home equity and pay off debt. Reverse mortgages allow the borrower to receive income in monthly installments, a lump-sum payment or a line of credit from which the borrower can make periodic withdrawals.

The loan becomes due only when the property is sold or the youngest borrower on the mortgage dies, and the house is used as collateral for the government-insured loan and interest.

Mortgage brokers such as Bob Allen say reverse mortgages have become part of a "normal retirement plan."

"The reasons people take them out are as varied as people's lives," said Allen, who also has a reverse mortgage.

Statewide, the number of reverse mortgages rose 20 percent from 669 in 2008 to 803 this year. And nationally, reverse mortgages -- known as Home Equity Conversion Mortgages -- jumped 5 percent from 73,875 to 77,908 during the same period.

When Allen saw his 401(k) plummeting, he knew something had to be done. Upon retiring at 65, Allen and his wife, Zeta, got a reverse mortgage on their five-bedroom Hobart home and are now receiving $518 a month to supplement their retirement income.

Loan amounts are largely based on the borrower's age, home value and current interest rates, and the home must be the primary residence. There are no income requirements, and Congress increased the maximum home value that is considered from $417,000 to $625,500, making reverse mortgages available to more homeowners.

Source

Friday, June 26, 2009

Bankrate: Mortgage Rates Reverse Course


NEW YORK, June 18, 2009 /PRNewswire-FirstCall via COMTEX/ -- Mortgage rates pulled back sharply this week, with the average 30-year fixed mortgage rate falling to 5.76 percent. According to Bankrate.com's weekly national survey, the average 30-year fixed mortgage has an average of 0.43 discount and origination points.

The average 15-year fixed rate mortgage sank to 5.19 percent, while the average jumbo 30-year fixed rate inched higher to 6.97 percent. Adjustable rate mortgages were mixed, with the average 3-year ARM rising to 5.38 percent and the 5-year ARM dropping to 5.37 percent.

Mortgage rates retreated after a hefty run-up that had 30-year fixed mortgage rates flirting with the 6 percent mark. The concerns about eventual inflation that drove bond yields and mortgage rates higher have been tempered by the reality of continued weakness in the economy. Given the long road ahead economically, investors saw value in fixed income instruments like government bonds and mortgage-backed debt after rates had spiked upward. This helped bring mortgage rates back down and re-open the door to refinancing for homeowners that thought it had closed just a couple weeks ago. Mortgage rates are closely related to yields on long-term government debt.

Mortgage rates, though higher than in recent months, are significantly lower than one year ago. This time last year, the average 30-year fixed mortgage rate was 6.62 percent, meaning a $200,000 loan would have carried a monthly payment of $1,279.96. With the average rate now 5.76 percent, the monthly payment for the same size loan would be $1,168.42, a savings of $111 per month for a homeowner refinancing now.

SURVEY RESULTS

30-year fixed: 5.76% -- down from 5.95% last week (avg. points: 0.43)

15-year fixed: 5.19% -- down from 5.37% last week (avg. points: 0.37)

5/1 ARM: 5.37% -- down from 5.49% last week (avg. points: 0.4)

Bankrate's national weekly mortgage survey is conducted each Wednesday from data provided by the top 10 banks and thrifts in the top 10 markets.

For a full analysis of this week's move in mortgage rates, go to http://www.bankrate.com/mortgagerates

The survey is complemented by Bankrate's weekly forward-looking Rate Trend Index, in which a panel of mortgage experts predicts which way the rates are headed over the next 30 to 45 days. The consensus this week, according to 53 percent of the panelists, is that rates will continue to decline. Only 20 percent expect a rebound in rates and 27 percent expect mortgage rates to remain more or less unchanged over the next 30 to 45 days.

For the full mortgage Rate Trend Index, go to http://www.bankrate.com/RTI

About Bankrate, Inc.

The Bankrate network of companies includes Bankrate.com, Interest.com, Mortgage-calc.com, Nationwide Card Services, Savingforcollege.com, Fee Disclosure, InsureMe, CreditCardGuide.com and Bankaholic.com. Each of these businesses helps consumers make informed decisions about their personal finance matters. The company's flagship brand, Bankrate.com is a destination site of personal finance channels, including banking, investing, taxes, debt management and college finance. Bankrate.com is the leading aggregator of rates and other information on more than 300 financial products, including mortgages, credit cards, new and used auto loans, money market accounts and CDs, checking and ATM fees, home equity loans and online banking fees. Bankrate.com reviews more than 4,800 financial institutions in 575 markets in 50 states. In 2008, Bankrate.com had nearly 72 million unique visitors. Bankrate.com provides financial applications and information to a network of more than 75 partners, including Yahoo! (Nasdaq: YHOO - News), America Online (NYSE: TWX - News), The Wall Street Journal and The New York Times (NYSE: NYT - News). Bankrate.com's information is also distributed through more than 500 newspapers.

Source

Thursday, June 25, 2009

FNMA Stops T-bill Reverse Mortgages


The FNMA has announced that they will no longer offer the purchase of the constant maturity Treasury (CMT-indexed) Home Equity Conversion Mortgage in order to help standardize Reverse Mortgage rates and simplify the variety of products. The move is also intended to build liquidity for the product, and encourage the market to shift toward securitization.

They made their announcement on June 1, 2009, stating that they would discontinue the purchase of the CMT-indexed Home Equity Conversion Mortgage. The change will not become effective until September 1, 2009. Fannie Mae will continue to offer the purchase of monthly adjustable-rate LIBOR-indexes and fixed-rate HECMs. Lenders may still obtain pricing and continue to commit CMT-indexed reverse mortgages until August 31, 2009.

The margins on the Treasury-based CMT have been rising faster over the past year than the LIBOR, thus the CMT recently has not been as popular due to decreased returns and higher fees.

Fannie Mae's recent pricing changes for HECMs had caused lenders to raise margins to a point where the CMT-based loans were becoming obsolete. Based on HECM lending formulas, borrowers have been receiving greater proceeds with London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) indexed loans lately, and more are also locking in low fixed rates.

Currently, the indices available for adjustable-rate Home Equity Conversion Mortgages (HECM) sold to Fannie Mae include the (LIBOR) index and the weekly average yield on U.S. Treasury securities adjusted to a constant maturity of one year (CMT) index. Reverse Mortgages indexed to CMT are available with monthly and annual interest rate adjustment options. LIBOR-indexes are available only with a monthly interest rate adjustment option.

There is no specific deadline for delivering CMT-indexes to Fannie Mae. Lenders may deliver CMT-indexed HECMs up to the expiration dates of their remaining outstanding CMT-indexed HECM commitments. Delivery fees for seasoned reverse mortgage loans continue to apply as before.

The LIBOR has been a popular alternative to the CMT for lenders because it is an international index rate instead of being a US index.
Interest rates as of June 15, 2009 had the net rate for the HECM LIBOR 325 at 3.57%, and the HECM CMT 325 at 3.74%. The total interest rate is calculated by adding the interest rate index plus a margin set by the lender. For example, a HECM CMT 300 refers to the reverse mortgage program that is using the CMT index and a margin of 300. If the CMT index is 2.10% then the total rate is 2.10% plus the 3.00% margin which equals an interest rate of 5.10%.

The elimination of the CMT is only a further step in the trend of lenders favoring LIBOR products. Predictions indicated that the pricing on CMT products would further diminish, making the need for it insignificant in today’s marketplace. Consumers were already receiving a similar principal limit and a lower margin.

Robert Griffin specializes in reverse mortgages and has earned the accolade of No. 1 reverse mortgage broker in the Southwest for three years in a row. The owner of Griffin Financial Mortgage LLC, based in Fort Worth, his memberships include the National Association of Mortgage Brokers (NAMB), the Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA), the National Reverse Mortgage Lenders Association (NMRLA) and the Better Business Bureau (BBB). If you would like an information packet or would like to set up an appointment with one of our reverse mortgage specialists, call (866) 683-3690 or complete our online Reverse Mortgage Information.

Source

Sunday, June 21, 2009

Tax Consequences Resulting from Foreclosure on a Reverse Mortgage


One of the most perplexing aspects of the Home Equity Conversion Mortgages (HECMs) is the income tax consequences of forgiving (or canceling) any portion of the balance due through short sale, foreclosure, trustee’s sale, or deed in lieu of foreclosure. (This article does not address the income tax consequences of abandonments.) The complexity stems from the nonrecourse nature of reverse mortgages and the promise that no deficiency judgment can be obtained against the mortgagor or heirs. However, the “no liability” promise does not extend to income tax consequences to borrowers or successor owners of the property who receive their ownership as the direct result of the death of the borrower.

Unless otherwise noted, the word “foreclosure” as used in this article includes short sales, trustee’s sales, deeds in lieu of foreclosure, foreclosures, and all other similar forms of transfers of homes (except abandonments) where at time of transfer the amount due on a HECM is greater than the value of the home (net of all liens having a higher priority above the HECM).

HECM Proceeds Can Be Taxable

Reverse mortgage proceeds can become taxable if any portion is forgiven by the lender. If nonrecourse debt is forgiven in a transaction other than sale such as loan modification, it will generally have the same tax ramifications as the forgiveness of recourse debt which is taxable as ordinary income under Section (§) 61(a)(12) of the 1986 Internal Revenue Code as Amended (IRC). A portion or all of the resulting income may be excludible under IRC § 108.

Foreclosure is considered a sale of the underlying property for income tax purposes. Under IRC Regulation § 1.1001-2, the sales price of the property is the sum of nonrecourse debt forgiven plus the fair market value of the property at the time of foreclosure.

Some theoreticians argue that HECM proceeds are not taxable in foreclosure as long as the total of the accrued but unpaid 1) monthly servicing fees, 2) FHA insurance fees charged on the outstanding balance (not upfront fees since they reduce available proceeds), and 3) interest exceeds the amount forgiven. There is no such argument when the amount forgiven exceeds that total.

A few taxpayers claim to have successfully argued in IRS audit that since FHA insurance proceeds were used to pay the shortfall and they paid for the policy with after-tax dollars, FHA insurance proceeds are nontaxable and the payoff falls outside of the foreclosure provisions. They refer to the income taxation of proceeds from life insurance policies in the event of death, medical insurance, and property casualty insurance. Since all of these situations are excludible by specific tax provisions, the argument has little substance and no legal precedence. As will be seen if these loans were HECMs, the audit “winners” might have been overall tax losers.

Illustrations

For example, assume a mortgagor owes $350,000 on a HECM but the appraised value of the home is only $250,000 when the mortgagor surrenders the deed in lieu of foreclosure in 2009. The mortgagor purchased the home in 1974 for $55,000 and spent $50,000 in renovations; however, the mortgagor deferred gains from prior sales of $37,000 — under former § 1034 of the IRC — for an adjusted tax basis of $68,000 (i.e., $55,000 + $50,000 - $37,000). This has been and continues to be his sole and principal residence since 1974. For tax purposes the sales price from foreclosure would be $350,000 [i.e., $250,000 (appraised value) plus the $100,000 from the nonrecourse debt forgiven]. The tax gain would be $282,000 (i.e., $350,000 - $68,000).

Determining gain is not the end of the story. Other income tax provisions may apply. By way of illustration, if the mortgagor in the example is single and meets all of the exclusion rules under the exclusion of gain on the sale of a principal residence provision of IRC § 121, he could exclude $250,000 of the gain leaving only $32,000 to be recognized as a long-term capital gain.

If instead the mortgagor had bought the house for $370,000 in 2005, had done no improvements, and had no prior gains deferred under IRC former § 1034, the adjusted basis of the home would be $370,000. The foreclosure loss would be $20,000 (i.e., $350,000 - $370,000) and as a loss from the sale of a principal residence is a non-deductible personal loss which cannot offset taxable gains or be deducted in any way.

Source

Saturday, June 20, 2009

Reverse mortgage fails to move forward


Financing marriage expenses is not as Herculean a task as before, thanks to the reverse mortgage facility for senior citizens. “This facility has helped me conduct my daughter’s marriage without bothering too much about the expenses,” says Mr Seshadri, a senior citizen. Though he had saved for his daughter’s wedding, Mr Seshadri found that the budgeted amount and the actual sums he was incurring closer to the date of the wedding were poles apart.
Hassle-free

With banks wary of giving personal loans to senior citizens, Mr Seshadri had the option of going to a financier, but found the rates exorbitant. So he decided to make use of the reverse mortgage facility.

“It turned out to be hassle-free. I did not have to produce any income-proof or eligibility certificate. I had acquired this house when in service. My title deeds were clear and the rate was 10.75 per cent. A personal loan would have been more costly,” said Seshadri, recalling the ease with which he was able to get the finance.

He was among half-a-dozen senior citizens who took the reverse mortgage route, primarily to conduct their children’s wedding.

The facility allows senior citizens to unlock the value of their valuable asset, that is, their house, by mortgaging it and using the money while continuing to live in it until their death.
Lumpsum, instalments

A total of 22 banks and two housing finance companies offer this financial product in the country.

The applicant has the option of receiving a lumpsum amount or at fixed monthly or quarterly intervals. The amount payable is calculated on the market value of the house the senior citizen owns and occupies for residential purpose.

For instance, if the property is valued at Rs 10 lakh, State Bank of India is prepared to give 90 per cent of this value as the qualifying amount for the loan. The applicant is paid Rs 21,619 per lakh (for every qualifying Rs 1 lakh of loan if he opts for lumpsum payment) or Rs 225 a month (for every qualifying Rs 1 lakh of loan). The sum, however, would vary depending on the tenure of the loan, which is fixed at 10 or 15 years, again, depending on the age of the senior citizen.

Among other public sector banks, SBI has been trying to market this product quite aggressively. But sources admit that attempts to popularise the reverse mortgage scheme have not been as successful as in the West.
Yet to catch on

The Government though is signalling its interest in encouraging the scheme. Consider the tax treatment of the loan — Section 10(43) exempts any loan received by an individual, whether lumpsum or in instalments, in a transaction of reverse mortgage, if it conforms to the scheme notified by the Central Government.

So, where is the catch? Why has the reverse mortgage scheme failed to take off?

Observers say the scheme is loaded against the borrower. He gets a little over 20 per cent on every Rs 1 lakh, which is a pittance. Instead of mortgaging the property, the senior citizen should consider to sell the property and invest the proceeds in a bank and live in a rented house or settle peacefully in a home for senior citizens.

The interest earned from the sums deposited should be sufficient to take care of his monthly requirements. There are old folks without children and some out of luck with their wards. In both cases, they may not have enough sums to pay even for their essentials. Above all, the borrower does not have to worry about the dues the legal heirs to the property would have to settle (on his death) to retrieve the property.

The structure of the product is flawed. While one would expect the period of the loan to extend till the lifetime of the borrower(s), it has been specified as ‘not exceeding 20 years’ both in the Operational Guidelines and in the Reverse Mortgage Scheme 2008. This puts into question the fate of the senior citizen if he survived beyond 20 years. And the amount that he receives for mortgaging his property cannot be considered as a single source of income for survival. It can only supplement his other income, note observers. Then why did Mr Seshadri and few others opt for it?

According to the lending institutions, the few who avail of this facility are planning to repay/foreclose the loan during their lifetime out of their income from other sources.

Further, the interest rate is not much compared to a personal loan, for which they would anyway not be eligible, bank sources say. And that’s not all. Sentiments overrule, when it comes to mortgaging one’s own dwelling.

Source

Friday, June 19, 2009

How Does A Reverse Mortgage Work - Different Kinds Of Reverse Mortgage Rates


Unless you have been fortunate enough to be born to an extremely wealthy family, you would have to face the reality of having to go through the process of taking out a mortgage to provide you and your family the needed financial help to meet basic financial obligations and responsibilities. There is a proliferation of different mortgage plans and programs that are available to the average American citizen to choose from. One type of mortgage plans that is gaining popularity is the reverse mortgage program.

Apart from looking at the reputation of the financial institution offering reverse mortgage housing plans, it is also important to look into the rates that are applied to each reverse mortgage programs. The reverse mortgage rates are determined by a number of different factors ranging from the period of time of the reverse mortgage plan to the amount that would be taken out and the frequency f the payment schedule.

Below is a review of some of the most popular reverse mortgage housing plans and the interest rates that are applied to them.

Home Keeper Reverse Mortgage

The interest rates that are applied on the different reverse mortgage housing plans offered by Home Keeper have been primarily based on the weekly average one-month secondary market CD index following a margin that has been set by Fannie Mae. These averages have been published in the Federal Reserve’s H-15 Bulletin. The initial interest rate and subsequent adjustments that may be made on the reverse mortgage plan rounded to the nearest 1/8 percent. Over the course of the life of the reverse mortgage plan, the margin implemented would remain constant. As such, it does not fluctuate based on the age of the individual applying for the reverse mortgage plan. This means that the same interest rate would be implemented on the reverse mortgage plan whether the applicant is a young professional or a senior citizen. The drawback of this reverse mortgage plan, however, is that since it is based on a monthly published margin, there is a possibility that the interest rate applied on the reverse mortgage taken out could fluctuate on a monthly basis. While Home Keeper has placed a cap on the increase of the interest rate applied on the reverse mortgage taken out, the borrower should anticipate the increase of the interest to be as high as 17% on a monthly basis.

Home Equity Conversion Mortgage (HECM)

For this kind of reverse mortgage plan, the financial institution may opt to implement to utilize an initial rate or to use the current reverse mortgage rate to be applied on the reverse mortgage that is being taken out by a borrower. Once the selected reverse mortgage rate is applied to the reverse mortgage plan taken out, this can no longer be changed. This particular reverse mortgage program only provides an annual or monthly repayment schedule. The interest rates implemented, whether it is the initial rate or the current reverse mortgage rates are set annually by the US Treasury. It is advisable that the borrower would utilize the funds provided by this type of reverse mortgage plan since the repayment schedule would be based on the actual amount that is applied for, whether it is used or not.

Expected Reverse Mortgage

Expected reverse mortgage are very much similar to HECM reverse mortgage plans in that the interest rates are set annually by the US Treasury. In the expected reverse mortgage plan the interest rate is one of the things that are taken into consideration when computing for the amount of the reverse mortgage that a borrower may be eligible to take out. The maturity of expected reverse mortgages is approximately ten years.

Source

Thursday, June 18, 2009

Generation Turns To GNMA For Competitive Fixed Rate Reverse Mortgage


Generation Mortgage announced to its brokers that is in the process of working out the details in order to offer a competitive fixed rate HECM utilizing Ginnie Mae’s HECM MBS product.

Currently the product is available to a select group of brokers in order to fulfill its commitments to Ginnie Mae, but they plan to open it up widely mid to late June said a company statement.

Companies like MetLife and Generation are able to offer extremely competitive fixed products using Ginne Mae’s HMBS product due to investor interest from Wall Street. Rate sheets that I’ve seen show rates are almost 1% better (lower) when compared to lenders delivering fixed rate products to Fannie Mae.

However, Ginnie Mae’s pricing advantage comes with some additional risks to lenders. “The biggest concern is that Ginne Mae requires the loan to be repurchased out of the fund when it hits 98%, and if the loan is in default for taxes or insurance, HUD won’t take it,” said Sherry Apanay, Senior VP of Generation Mortgage.

This creates a problem for non-bank reverse lenders who don’t have the ability to hold the loan on its balance sheet until it pays off. Sources tell RMD that there continues to be discussions between potential issuers and Ginne Mae officials to see if there is a way to restructure the program to ensure non-bank lenders can compete.

Source

Wednesday, June 10, 2009

SOME FINANCIAL ADVICE ON THE QUESTION OF REVERSE MORTGAGES


Peter and Lana have seen the TV commercials about reverse mortgages. They were wondering if it would be a good way to go to help ease their current financial situation.

A reverse mortgage is simply an advance on the value of your home that accumulates interest. The accumulated debt does not need to be paid off until you die, sell the home or move out of the house. If you qualify, and are over the age of 62, you can get up to 30% of the value of your home and you can do whatever you want with the money. According to information, a reverse mortgage delivers the cash tax-free. Of course, if the money is used to invest and produce an income, some or all of that income will be taxable.

It is very important to understand the cost of a reverse mortgage before getting into one. Information obtained states that there could be an administrative fee of about $1,300 to set up your plan or more. On top of that, you will be able to choose a term of six months, one year or three years to determine the interest rate on your loan. Rates, of course will be subject to change at the end of the term. Interest is compounded semi-annually.

For example, if Peter and Lana get a reverse mortgage for 30% of the value of their $250,000 house and choose a three-year term (7.50% on Sept. 13, 2005), they would get $75,000 today to do as they please. Don't forget the $1,300 set up fee. Lana, at age 62, has a life expectancy of about 24 years. At that time, assuming no change in interest rates, the amount owing will have grown to over $439,026.

In spite of escalating home values over the last several years, they haven't appreciated in value much more than the rate of inflation over long periods of time. If we assume an inflation rate of 3% their home may be worth about $508,199 in 24 years. That leaves only $69,173 after paying off the loan. A contract clause found, states that "as property values decrease, the amount to be repaid is never more than the fair market value of the property at the time it is sold".

There are other ways to get money out of your home. You can sell it and buy something smaller. A home equity line of credit at much lower interest rates may also be a possibility. Talking with a Certified Financial Planner and exploring other ways to create income might be your best investment. It appears a reverse mortgage is great, if you have no one to leave your equity to.

Source

Saturday, June 6, 2009

2009 Reverse Mortgage Changes


The Housing and Economic Recovery Act and The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act have made the Reverse Mortgage program available to even more seniors across the US

The Home Equity Conversion Mortgage (HECM or “Heck-um”) which is the HUD reverse mortgage, went for many years with just a couple of different options, and a margin that stayed constant. You basically had a choice between a monthly adjustable and a yearly adjustable, both with a Constant Maturity Treasury (CMT) for the index and a single option for the margin.

The secondary market for reverse mortgages was good, there were proprietary products which funded loans on properties valued much higher than those on which HUD could lend. HUD had different lending limits in different parts of the country and the demand was stable. But reverse mortgages have seen a lot of quick changes over the last 12 – 18 months and 2009 does not appear to be an end to this trend.

The secondary market has all but dried up and proprietary products have disappeared. Now the HUD HECM Reverse Mortgage is the only game in town with the possible exception of one or two extremely selective and narrow private products. Margins are rising, sometimes almost monthly as borrowers try to close their loans only to find that the margin they thought they would receive is no longer available. What once was offered at 100 basis points over the CMT (and for brief periods even lower) is now being offered at 300 Basis Points over the LIBOR or 350 – 375 Basis Points over the CMT.

There are also now fixed rate reverse mortgage loans available, but they come with fewer options available as to how the borrowers can access their funds. A fixed rate reverse mortgage borrower must take a single draw, whereas a borrower opting for the adjustable rates can choose to take a lump sum; a payment for a set period of time (term) or for life (tenure); a line of credit which can be accessed at their choice; or a combination of all of the above.

Some changes for 2009 were actually put into motion in 2008 with the Housing and Economic Recovery Act (HERA) which was signed into law on July 30, 2008 by George W. Bush. Among many other things included in the Act, HERA increased the limits for HECM to a nationwide limit of $417,000 from the previous county by county lower limits starting in the low $200’s for some counties and going to $362,790 in all but some of the highest cost counties in Alaska, Hawaii, Virgin Islands etc. where HUD allowed for higher limits.

However, this raised limit has been increased still further until December 31, 2009 by yet another piece of legislation, The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 which was signed into law by President Obama on February 17, 2009. For the balance of 2009, the limit for the HECM Reverse Mortgage program limit is $625,500 which has helped many senior borrowers with higher balance homes, especially those whose retirement funds saw huge drops when the stock market plummeted.

Another change which was approve with HERA in 2008 but did not take effect until 2009 is the HECM for purchase program. The program was supposed to have been in effect on January 1, 2009 and there was quite a bit of confusion in its beginning. HUD issued Mortgagee Letter 2008-33 which, when issued, actually stated that HUD would require seniors to put less money down if they could find properties for purchase which appraised for more than the selling price.

HUD indicated that there would be a clarification to this lending methodology but then was silent on the issue until they issued Mortgagee Letter 2009-11 on March 27, 2009 which kept most lenders on the sidelines, unwilling to release the HECM for purchase program until HUD clarified its down payment requirements. Now senior borrowers must bring in their down payments and closing costs based on the lesser of the sales price or the appraised value, not just the appraised value as Mortgagee Letter 2008-33 originally stated.

Another addition yet to come with HERA is Reverse Mortgage for Co-ops. There are a lot of areas anxious to see how this will come out and what the restrictions will be. There are both traditional Co-op units and Manufactured Co-ops hoping to be included in the eligibility.

However, after talking to some lenders on the subject, how quickly or even if a lender decides to offer the HECM for Co-ops in a given market will not only depend on how soon HUD announces that it is available, but also how quickly or even if the particular lender is willing to lend on and service loans on Cooperative Projects in any given area or state. Co-ops may not be available as quickly as HUD announces they are ready to roll out the program if the lenders do not put the work into the legal documents, etc.

A couple of other noteworthy items that will greatly affect HECM’s in 2009 and beyond is the issuance of Mortgagee Letter 2008-24 which eliminated the ability of any non-HUD approved lenders to participate in the origination of the HECM product. Prior to this time, HUD (at least passively) allowed for the participation in an advisory capacity of brokers who were not HUD approved in the HECM program. Those brokers could help in the education, advise in the process and accept only a portion of the origination fee due the lender (they could not charge separately for their services).

To be involved in the origination of reverse mortgages now, mortgage brokers must be HUD-approved. There is also another looming date in 2009 for reverse mortgage borrowers and lenders, and that is September 30, 2009. There is a statutory cap on the number of HECM’s that HUD can insure at any time of 275,000 which has been temporarily exceeded when the cap was reached several years ago.

Congress has suspended the cap through various spending Bills and other measures ever since, but there have been times, some very short, when no HECM loans could be insured until another stop-gap could be passed. If the 275,000 limit is not once again temporarily suspended or if Congress does not vote to permanently eliminate the cap, once again the program could come to a grinding halt.

Source

Friday, June 5, 2009

Loan Growth Augmenting Core Business at MetLife


Most financial services companies wouldn't consider themselves "lucky" to have bought two mortgage providers last year amid a wicked housing slump. Then again, maybe they didn't have MetLife Inc.'s ulterior motives.

"Our timing really couldn't have been any better," said Donnalee A. DeMaio, the president of MetLife Bank and a member of its board of directors. "Our mortgage business has really taken off," particularly refinancings, she said.

Along with its mortgage business has come the opportunities for MetLife to cross-sell its insurance products and services.

MetLife Bank opened more than 200 mortgage offices nationally in the past year, reporting $41.1 million in first-quarter net income while originating about $1.5 billion in monthly loans.

MetLife Bank made two acquisitions last year to establish its lending business. In May 2008 it bought EverBank Reverse Mortgage LLC and a month later bought First Horizon Home Loans, a Dallas mortgage originator, from First Tennessee Bank. That acquisition made MetLife the 15th-largest mortgage originator nationally.

DeMaio said in an interview last week that MetLife Bank had the advantage of learning from the mistakes of competitors left saddled with bad loans after buying lending businesses.

In the First Horizon deal, MetLife bought the company's origination and servicing capabilities but did not buy any existing loans. With Everbank, DeMaio said MetLife bought a reverse mortgages business "in its infancy" that did not have a large book of business.

"We were able to buy all of the capabilities that we needed in order to grow," she said. "Now our plan is to grow organically."

DeMaio, who spent 18 years at PricewaterhouseCoopers before joining MetLife Bank in 2002, described MetLife Bank's cross-selling strategy: "There is a natural opportunity when someone is getting a mortgage for us to offer them homeowner's insurance. We are looking for ways to seamlessly make referrals from one line of business to another. When someone is buying a home, it is a natural opportunity to discuss homeowner's and life insurance. Ultimately, our objective is to create a customer for life."

DeMaio said MetLife Bank also wants to gather deposits. "We want customers to know we are not just a mortgage company, we are a bank. By offering mortgages, it just gives us another avenue to look at our customers' entire financial picture."

Analysts say MetLife may have a blueprint for how an insurer can thrive as a bank holding company. "MetLife clearly has a strategy where it wants to use its banking and mortgage services as a way to offer cradle-to-grave services to its customers," said Carmen Effron, an analyst with C.F. Effron Co. LLC in Weston, Conn. "It can get in the door with lending and deposit services, and then work on how to invest and what insurance products to use later."

Burton Greenwald of BJ Greenwald Associates in Philadelphia said MetLife — which got a banking charter in 2001, but kept its banking unit below 100 employees until the deal with First Tennessee — has distanced itself from insurers that became banking holding companies for federal aid.

"MetLife didn't become a bank holding company to get … [Troubled Asset Relief Program] money," Effron said. "It didn't race in and start lending. MetLife started a bank and waited six or seven years, and it knew it was better off buying a shell and building a business on its own."

DeMaio said MetLife isn't looking to create a banking model that works for anyone but MetLife. "There certainly are other banks owned by insurers, and they each have their own missions, some of which are probably like MetLife Bank's, and some of which may be different," she said. "But you'd really have to talk to them to get their strategy. An insurer-owned bank certainly could pursue a share-of-wallet strategy as much as a brand-promise strategy, but each organization will have to do what is most in line with its goals."

Analysts said MetLife Bank's first-quarter results are a bit misleading. They said it generated healthy profits in the quarter because of a "boom in refinancing," as one analyst put it, but they said it could be difficult to maintain such strong results.

DeMaio said she expects lending conditions to "remain volatile," but she thinks MetLife has the pieces in place to build and maintain a strong mortgage business. She said mortgage origination is expected to remain solid as long as rates remain low. "We know that refis will slow down," she said. "When you really look at it, the government is involved in the economy, and that has kept the rates low. But we have seen strong growth and we are excited."

MetLife Bank does not need more lending deals, she said, but it will be opportunistic. She said the company has MetLife Home Loan offices in 95% of markets where it wanted offices.

In the next five to 10 years, she said she thinks MetLife Bank will be able to contribute 10% of MetLife Inc.'s profits annually. When the mortgage market "normalizes, it will be more of a challenge to keep volumes up," she said, but she remains confident in its strategy. "We are going to emerge from, whatever you want to call this economic environment, a different type of financial services industry," she said. "Lending is going to go back to basics. People are going to need down payments and a good loan-to-value. We are going to go back to lending like it was meant to be, and strong companies will survive. Without the baggage of bad loans, we can look forward."

Source